Repatriation still has a commission. Who guards the promise?

Dear Editor,

Australia still has a Repatriation Commission. The question is whether veterans can actually see it guarding the principle its name represents.

Albanese Labor’s abandoned $5000 veterans’ allied-health cap exposed the problem. Veterans could see the policy, the budget arithmetic and eventually the backflip. What they could not readily see was whether the Commission supported the proposal, opposed it, sought changes or had any practical power to challenge it.

Repatriation is more than a word left over from history.

If the Commission still carries the Repatriation name, veterans should be able to see it guarding the Repatriation promise.

I expand on this at markcroxford.net/read

Mark Croxford
Founder, Veterans Count
20-year Navy veteran, and
former media and political adviser to a Minister for Veterans’ Affairs and Minister for Defence Personnel

ChatGPT image


.

.


.


.

Posted by Brian Hartigan

CONTACT Editor-at-large

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *