New landing craft heavy for Army
Army’s ability to fight and win in the littoral is one step closer with the signing of a $4 billion agreement for the construction of eight landing craft heavy (LCH) vessels.
CAPTION: Chief of Army Lieutenant General Simon Stuart at Henderson shipyard, Western Australia, after the contract signing ceremony for the eight landing craft heavy vessels. Story by Major Peter Nugent. Photos by Corporal Nakia Chapman.
The LCH program accelerates Army’s transformation in support of the 2024 National Defence Strategy (NDS) and the 2024 Naval Shipbuilding and Sustainment Plan.
Based on the Damen Naval Landing Ship Transport 100-class design, the LCH will be able to transport more than 500 tonnes to manoeuvre, project and sustain land forces across the Indo‑Pacific during operations and disaster relief missions.
Chief of Army Lieutenant General Simon Stuart said the new vessels underpinned Army’s transformation to deliver land power where it matters most: in the littoral, defined simply as the part of the country near the coast.
“Consistent with the NDS, and in an increasingly complex strategic environment, Army is rapidly transforming to optimise for littoral manoeuvre paired with long‑range strike capabilities,” Lieutenant General Stuart said.
“These vessels will allow us to operate across the beaches, rivers, coastal and jungle environments that define our region, and will shape future conflict.”
The landing craft will provide the reach and lift to manoeuvre Army’s modernised combined-arms land system, from Abrams main battle tanks and high mobility artillery rocket systems (HIMARS) to Boxer combat reconnaissance vehicles and Redback infantry fighting vehicles.
Lieutenant General Stuart said the fleet, crewed by a specialised workforce, would enable rapid manoeuvre, concentrated effects and sustained long-range strike and air defence in support of the ADF’s joint force.
“Our future littoral fleet, along with Army’s combined‑arms land system, make us more lethal and survivable, strengthening our ability to hold adversaries at risk and to secure strategic terrain,” he said.
“We are working with the Royal Australian Navy and industry to accelerate training pathways for our littoral warfighters – from maritime warfare officers to marine technicians – ensuring crews will be skilled, safe and ready.”
The build tasking statement for the eight LCH was signed with Austal Defence Australia, at Henderson in Western Australia.
Construction is scheduled to begin later this year and all eight vessels are expected to be delivered by 2038.
This announcement follows the execution of the $1 billion Design and Build Tasking statement for 18 landing craft medium vessels, under the pilot program for the Strategic Shipbuilding Agreement.
The 26 vessels represent the largest recapitalisation of Army’s littoral capability since the Second World War.
.
.
.
.


The RAN took over the first LCH squadron with the commissioning of HMAS BRUNIE in January 1973. BALIKPAPAN was with army water transport and was the last vessel to come over to the RAN. They were great vessels and I had the good fortune to serve on 3 with a short crew stand in for a couple of weeks on a 4th.
These new vessels should be with the RAN because if they are used like the first squadron, they will be utilized for more work than quoted. I remember being told the LCH’s spent more time at sea than other ships of the fleet including survey ships. I don’t know what is left of the old water transport company (had many a good meet-up at different ports with Army crew of BALIKPAPAN). The navy has the expertise to operate and maintain ships why duplicate and double the cost, the other point I would make is do-not over man these vessels. When we commissioned the first squadron, we had a crew of 13 when I read the decommissioning crew list of these vessels, they had a crew of 19.
Duh,
One would expect the RAN to be buying, paying and maintain these vessels as Previously.
The Army does not have the expertise and will cost unnecessary millions to train and maintain soldiers to be claytons’ sailors.
The forming of the ADF was to work together not take ever other services areas of expertise.
Deputy Chief of Army got it right Army has lost the plot.
ADF what a joke.
Jack
I think the last lot were manned by army & they seemed to do the job. Clive Steele, John Monash & Vernon Sturdee