RAAF is deliberately dropping ‘Royal Australian’ from its name
Share the post "RAAF is deliberately dropping ‘Royal Australian’ from its name"
I receive numerous ministerial and departmental press release that include references to “Air Force” without any reference to “Royal Australian” or “RAAF”.
Here are some examples…
- Welfare Dogs
- Memorial Unveilled
- Space launch
- Veteran donor, and,
- no more starker ‘proof’ than this web-site screenshot –>
And, here’s a very interesting example (added May 2021) – the Air Force Newspaper that reported on the RAAF’s Centenary, contained 149 references to “Air Force” (not counting the newspaper’s name) and only six references to the “Royal Australian Air Force” – four of which were in advertisements.
Since first publishing on this issue, I have also been contacted by several people, including RAAF members, who told me there actually is an (unofficial) active campaign to preference “Air Force” over “Royal Australian Air Force” – even to the extent that ‘Royal Australian’ comes back crossed out with red pen from higher-rank clearance processes.
Yet, when asked officially, Defence responded…
“Defence can confirm that the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has not, and does not intend to discontinue the use of either the national indicator ‘Australian’, nor the ‘Royal’ prefix approved by King George V in June 1921.
However, it is also acceptable convention to refer to the RAAF as ‘Air Force’; particularly in the domestic context, or where mentioned in conjunction with their sibling services Navy and Army.“
Ironically, the very next day, I received a press release from Defence that started off with “After 35 years in the Australian Air Force…” – feeling the need to clarify that they were referring specifically to our domestic air force, while pointedly excluding the ‘Royal’ prefix.
I also found this statement on the web site of what used to be called the Royal Australian Air Force Association – now called Air Force Association…
“…in 2016, when the Association’s National entity became a Company Limited by Guarantee the title was formally changed to reflect its early commonly referred title, ‘Air Force Association’, which is also in keeping with the RAAF’s branding as ‘Air Force’.“
Does anyone need any more proof that RAAF has a deliberate, considered, discussed and promulgated ‘branding policy’ that dictates the dropping of ‘Royal Australian’ from their name? (and marks the official answer given to CONTACT by Defence as a lie, or at best, deliberate obfuscation)
I will continue to monitor this issue 😉
Brian Hartigan
Editor
.
.
.
.
Share the post "RAAF is deliberately dropping ‘Royal Australian’ from its name"
I have no issue dropping “Royal Australian” in strictly internal documents, however, any mention of the Services outside the Services should include their full titles.
Perhaps this is an indication that Republicans are taking over by stealth?
Maybe our current insipid government are forcing their appeasement policies onto our military?
Maybe it’s a legacy of the last Chief of Defence who proved to be very disloyal to his subordinates?
I think though that it’s simply further evidence of the decline in national pride, led from the top, and its a f****** disgrace. It’s an insult to all of those who have sacrificed so much.
Have you also noticed that all the recent additions to the Navy have been named Australian Defence vessels (ADV) rather than HMAS??
Is there something bigger going on !!!
Yes, I have noticed that and am keeping an eye on it. Someone in the know told me it’s because the new boats don’t have heavy-enough weapons to warrant HMAS. While the new boats are very lightly armed, I’m not quite buying that excuse. The clincher for me will be when the first of the new off-shore patrol vessels are commissioned – which shouldn’t be too far off, given that the first was launched in December 2021.
RAN will always be the Senior Service over Army and Air Force. Army, who can carry heavy things and Air Force tip-toeing through the tulips. Say no more.
Who knows: maybe the time has come to grant recognition to the military. Anyone fancy “Royal Australian Army” and at the same time, relegating the Navy to no longer be the ‘senior (sic) service’?
I hope this is just a satire post. the Royal Australian title is only removed from branding to create something that is easier to associate with and say. If Australians are talking about the Navy or Air Force… good bet that we are talking about our Services.
All official publications and references in Defence (even the text in most of the press releases) still uses the full title of Royal Australian Navy or Royal Australian Air Force.
Hi James. The story was not satire.
You are wrong in your assertion that all official publications carry the full title.
Further updates to the story ‘prove’ that removing “Royal Australian” from air force communications is official ‘branding’ policy.
Brian Hartigan, Editor.